EDITORIAL
Teachers deserve healthy raise
Yellow Springs teachers and the Board of Education don’t
appear to be that far apart in their negotiations for a new contract.
To settle the discussions, the board should improve upon its last offer,
which the teachers union rejected, and give the teachers a larger increase
in salaries, while the teachers should agree to change their health care
plan.
Striking such a deal would give the teachers a
much-needed raise, and allow them to stop worrying about contract negotiations
and focus on teaching, and would let the school board and top administrators
focus on the other business involved in running the school district. Quite
simply, the teachers deserve more money than what the board offered earlier
this month. And right now, the district can afford it. The board’s
latest proposal included pay increases of 3.5 percent this school year,
2.5 percent in 2006-07 and 2.25 percent the following year. The offer
would have increased the teachers’ insurance copays for office visits
and prescriptions.
Given the ever-increasing costs of insurance in
this country, raising teachers’ health insurance fees makes sense,
and is likely unavoidable. Everyone seems to be paying more for health
care. Of course, most workers expect to receive an annual cost-of-living
raise. Yellow Springs teachers deserve just that. The school board has
approached the negotiations with the teachers union with an eye to the
future, attempting to make a large surplus, $3.8 million, last over the
next five years. The board is concerned about rising costs of health care
and fuel and the likely decline of state funding for public education.
The teachers union contends that the district
is as healthy financially as ever, and with its significant surplus, can
afford raises that, Shawn Jackson, the president of the teachers union,
has described as keeping pace with inflation while keeping their current
health care plan in place. In fact, the raises offered by the board are
modest. Last year, when the board and the teachers union negotiated a
one-year deal, teachers received a 3.5 percent raise, which was less than
their previous contract in which they received raises of 4.5 percent in
2002-03 and 4 percent the follow year.
The negotiations between the Board of Education
and the teachers union are not going well. The union has rejected at least
two contract offers from the board. Last week, a group of teachers walked
out of the school board’s meeting when the board rearranged the
agenda so that a presentation on the school district’s financial
plan, the five-year forecast, came before the teachers could offer comments
to the board (and public).
Though nobody is saying this publicly, one thing
that is likely complicating the negotiations is a school board proposal
from last spring to give Superintendent Tony Armocida a 4 percent annual
raise over the next two years to mentor Yellow Springs High School Principal
John Gudgel as his successor.
All this is happening as the union that represents
the district’s support staff, the local chapter of the Ohio Association
of Public School Employees, and the school board approved a new two-year
contract in which the staff employees received 1.5 percent annual salary
increases and an additional 1.5 percent annual cash payments. Considering
the important role they play, good teachers will always be undervalued
and underpaid in this country. Their responsibility is great and they
deserve to be compensated for the valuable work they do. If the Yellow
Springs school district wants its teachers to go the extra mile by helping
students become exceptional men and women, then the district should show
that teachers are valued by giving them a reasonable compensation package.
Teachers are a school district’s most valuable
asset. They are the ones who work most closely with students and can have
a lasting impact on a student’s life. The Yellow Springs school
district has many excellent teachers and they deserve a healthy raise,
especially when the district has the funds available.
— Robert Mihalek |