Fogg development
poses worries for some merchants
|
Vote on annexation moved to Dec. 20 meeting
By Robert Mihalek
Village Council has moved to Dec. 20 the first
of two votes needed to officially accept a request to annex the
Fogg farm into Yellow Springs, Council president Tony Arnett announced
at Council’s meeting Nov. 15.
If the first reading is approved, Council will
hold a second reading and public hearing on the request at its meeting
on Feb. 7. Council is required to wait 30 days between votes on
the ordinance, Arnett said.
The first reading of the ordinance was originally
scheduled for Council’s Dec. 6 meeting.
The delay is driven by a state law that says a
municipality must wait 60 days to accept an annexed property. The
Village received notification on Oct. 12 that the Greene County
commissioners had approved the annexation, which cleared the way
for Council’s pending decision.
While in September Council members gave their
initial consent to the annexation request, they are still required
to vote again on the proposal, through an ordinance, before the
39-acre property officially may enter Yellow Springs.
The owners of the Fogg property want to develop
the land. Their plans include residences for people 55 and older,
apartments and service businesses.
Opposition to the plan has been growing since
September. Critics say that a proposal for what one of the owners
described as a “strip mall” could threaten the vitality
of downtown.
|
By Diane Chiddister
Opponents of the proposed development of the
Fogg farm cite as their main concern the development’s possible
harmful effect on downtown. It seems reasonable, then, to ask business
owners how they feel about the proposal.
Of the 17 business owners interviewed for this article,
some fear that their business will be hurt, while most said they worry
that the proposal could lead to a gradual downturn in downtown business.
A few merchants said that they didn’t know enough about the development
proposal to respond.
“You might bring more revenue to the Village,
but will it change life so much that we don’t want to live here?”
said Priscilla Moore, who has owned Mr. Fub’s Party for 24 years.
Many downtown businesses have been struggling because
of the country’s economic slump sparked by the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks, she said, and new businesses on the edge of Yellow Springs could
pull customers away from downtown.
In September Village Council gave initial consent to
a request from the owners of the Fogg farm to annex the 39-acre property
into Yellow Springs.
The owners, Harold Fogg and Beavercreek developer Doug
Miller of HRI Commercial Realty, hope to build a mixed-use development
that could include a strip mall that will serve the students of Antioch
University McGregor, which is slated to build a new campus across the
street, as well as housing and apartments. Miller has suggested that the
development could include a hotel, restaurant and copy shop to serve McGregor
students.
Council will give a first reading to an ordinance accepting
the property into Yellow Springs at its meeting Dec. 20. A second reading
and a public hearing will take place at Council’s Feb. 7 meeting.
In the meantime, many downtown business owners are
trying to figure out what the new development might mean to them.
While two people stated they didn’t believe the
development would affect downtown, the majority interviewed for this article
expressed concern.
Joe Williams, longtime employee at Ohio Silver, was
one businessman who didn’t forecast negative effects if a strip
mall were built on the town’s western edge.
“I honestly don’t think it would
hurt downtown,” he said. “We have a pretty good thing going
here and people come to shop here from all over the country.”
Still, Williams said, he opposes the idea because it
seems to go against Yellow Springs’ history of protecting green
space.
Other business people worry that a new business area
would harm Yellow Springs by drawing shoppers away from downtown.
“Yellow Springs needs growth, but this
is not necessarily the type of growth it needs,” said Tom Gray,
the owner of Tom’s Market, who suggested that instead of allowing
development on the village’s western edge, Council should focus
on refurbishing empty buildings or lots in the downtown area.
“I’d hate to see Yellow Springs become
a community like Fairborn, with a lot of empty strip malls,” Gray
said.
Cathy Christian, who has owned Ye Olde Trail Tavern
for 18 years, predicted that a new restaurant that caters to McGregor
students would hurt her business. Currently, the Tavern serves about a
dozen students who take classes at McGregor on Saturdays, according to
employee Scott Siegel. Christian believes that a new restaurant would
probably be part of a chain, which can order products in bulk and therefore
pay less for food.
“I could not compete price-wise because
I have to order in minimum amounts,” she said.
Christian also said she does not agree with Miller’s
assertion that McGregor students cannot find a restaurant in Yellow Springs
where they can eat in an hour and not pay high prices. She has worked
hard to keep her prices reasonable, Christian said, and her staff tries
to offer excellent service.
Beyond McGregor students, other customers would flock
to a new chain restaurant simply because it’s new, said Christian.
She recalled that the Tavern’s business was “bleak”
initially after the Fairfield Commons Mall opened several years ago, but
has since rebounded.
“It could be the new hot place for a couple
of years, long enough to hurt some of us and maybe kill some of us off,”
she said.
Suzanne Oldham, who bought and refurbished the Arthur
Morgan House bed and breakfast a year ago, said she was not comfortable
commenting about the proposed development’s effects on her own business.
But as to its effects on all downtown businesses, she said she fears that
people lodging on the edge of town would be less likely to patronize downtown
businesses and more likely to go elsewhere than would those staying in
the downtown area.
Tourists who shop at downtown businesses might be less
likely to come to Yellow Springs if the village begins looking like most
small towns, said several business owners who worry about the long-term
effects of the Fogg farm proposal.
“What would happen to why people come to
Yellow Springs?” said Patty Purdin, the owner of No Common Scents,
who noted that most of her business comes from out-of-towners. “People
say ‘I just love this quaint little town,’ ” she said.
Purdin cited Springfield as an example of a city where
business developed outside the central business district. “The downtown
died when the mall came,” she said.
Amy Boblitt said that business has been good at the
Sunrise Cafe since she and Brian Rainey bought the restaurant last summer.
But much of the business is tourist-based, and, she said, she worries
about the effects of the development.
“It takes away from the tourist pull,”
she said. “Tourists come here because it’s unique, not a regular
town with a strip mall.”
Peter “Owa” Mandelkern, co-owner of the
Village Herb Shoppe, said that while much of his business comes from mail
and Internet orders, out-of-towners make up a sizeable segment of his
customers.
“It seems ludicrous and unnecessary,”
he said of the proposed development. “What makes Yellow Springs
special is that we don’t have sprawl on the edge of town. It ruins
communities.”
The development also concerns one business owner whose
operation is not downtown: Eric Clark, who more than two years ago left
Yellow Springs Travel and bought the Springs Motel, which had for years
suffered from a seedy reputation. After countless hours of hard work,
Clark has turned the business around and he makes a living, though hardly
an opulent one, for himself and his young son.
“I took a serious financial sacrifice leaving
the agency and taking a rundown motel and turning it into something nice,
responsible and safe,” he said.
Clark believes that he knows what will happen if a
new motel rises on the west edge of town: he won’t make a living
at all.
“It would change dramatically the way I
do business,” Clark said. If a hotel is built on the Fogg farm,
Clark said, his options would likely be “to add more rooms or to
make the motel my hobby and get a full-time job or plant a lot of big
bushes in front and go back to charging by the hour. I will say that was
more profitable.”
Clark said that he finds it especially disturbing that
no one involved in the process, including Council members, has contacted
him to find out how the proposal would affect him. Noting that he’s
a lifelong Yellow Springs resident, a downtown business owner for 15 years
and a former member of the Chamber of Commerce executive committee, Clark
said he expected the courtesy of being contacted.
Pam Hogarty, whose downtown business, Unfinished Creations,
has been in town 30 years, also expressed concern for the development.
“Of course it will affect me. It will affect
all of us,” she said of her fellow business owners. Especially,
Hogarty said, she worries that those who come to shop in town might “get
stopped at the edge of town and not make it downtown.”
Hogarty said she has been disappointed in the process
involved in the development. “I think Council has gone about it
in a terrible way,” she said. “The correct way is to come
up with a plan of what you want and find someone to do it instead of having
someone else come and say, ‘Here’s what I’m going to
do.’ ”
Hogarty and several other business owners said they
also felt uncomfortable with how quickly Council gave the annexation its
initial consent.
In response to the business owners’ concerns,
Council president Tony Arnett said in an interview last week that Council
had no choice but to make a decision quickly on the initial request for
the annexation because the property owners had requested an expedited
process.
He also said that many villagers seem confused about
the scope of the development and the process involved.
“There has been confusion about what decisions
have been made, as if the September vote was approval of the entire project,”
Arnett said. “It was not. We haven’t even seen the project
and we know there’s a long road ahead on this.”
Council will next decide whether or not to give official
approval to the annexation request, and after that will decide whether
the property owners’ requests for zoning changes are appropriate,
Arnett said. At the rezoning stage, Council will determine whether businesses
may be included in the development, he said. If businesses are included,
he said, Council will have some, but not complete, control over the types
of businesses that would be allowed.
However, Arnett also said, the property owners have
the right to choose which businesses they wish to include.
“It’s not for me to say what makes
the best sense for them from a business perspective,” he said. “Our
job is to create policies and guidelines and then judge applications based
on those policies and guidelines.”
Arnett stressed that Miller’s proposal does not
include “what most people think of as retail, such as when you go
to downtown shops and buy goods.”
Arnett also said the proposed motel became part of
the development after Antioch McGregor requested temporary housing for
its students.
Arnett said he understands the concerns of local business
people but believes that many are fueled by “rumor and innuendo.”
He encouraged Yellow Springers concerned with the Fogg farm development
to take part in the public hearing on Feb. 7.
“The important part is to find constructive
ways to ask questions and suggest how things could be done differently
and find ways to collaborate and compromise with each other so that the
result is win/win,” Arnett said.
|