Council surveys
villagers about cuts
|
Changes made by council to
community survey
By Robert Mihalek
Village Council made a number of changes to the
community survey during the course of several months of discussion.
The survey, an attempt to gauge community support
for certain ways to raise revenue or reduce costs for the Village,
underwent a couple of revisions before Council approved it in October.
Some strategies to raise revenue or cut expenses
were either never considered or removed from the survey. The following
is a list of some of those options, based on drafts of previous
surveys.
Never included in the
survey
• Selling the Village electric
system
• Selling the library building
• Capital projects for the water and
sewer systems and the streets
• Police staffing: Council said it would
defer to Police Chief Carl Bush on the number of officers to have
on duty at the same time and on the police force.
• Daily operations: though the survey
asks local residents whether they are satisfied with Village services,
it does not include specific questions about many Village departments
and how they are run.
• Staffing
levels: questions about the number of Village staff were not included
in drafts of the survey.
Changes in the survey
• Growth: the first version of
the survey asked respondents how much growth they would support:
1, 2 or 3 percent. This question was later changed to ask villagers
only whether they support expanding the boundaries of Yellow Springs.
• Selling some neighborhood open space:
the survey initially included a question that asked whether villagers
would support selling some open spaces around town. The question
was dropped from the survey.
• Revenue questions: an initial
draft of the survey includes six questions gauging Yellow Springers’
support for revenue-generating mechanisms, including raising taxes
or reducing or eliminating the reciprocal tax. The questions were
dropped from the survey, then put back in.
• Fees for youth groups to use Gaunt
Park: Council eliminated a question asking whether respondents support
charging youth groups to use Gaunt Park.
•
Beggars’ Night: Council considered asking Yellow Springs about
their support for funding for Beggars’ Night activities, but
never included the question in the survey.
|
By Robert Mihalek
A Village survey, now scheduled to begin in December,
contains a number of questions about Village services that could be eliminated
or paired down, including the Gaunt Park Pool, Mayor’s Court and
police dispatching.
These services have been included in the survey by
Village Council, which wants to gauge community support for both cutting
costs through the reduction or elimination of some services and raising
revenue by increased taxes, fees or utility rates.
The survey asks Yellow Springers whether they want
to maintain, reduce or eliminate several Village services. All of the
services included in the survey are part of the Village’s multi-fund
budget, or general fund, which is supported by income taxes and other
various revenue sources. The multi-fund accounts for most of the Village’s
services except for the utilities.
Council agreed not to include the utilities in the
survey, indicating that Council is not considering selling those services.
This week, the Village distributed an educational brochure,
primarily prepared by Council president Tony Arnett, providing an overview
of the Village’s current financial situation and including various
options that have been identified to raise money and reduce costs.
This week, Wright State was scheduled to begin the
phone version of the survey, which will target 309 randomly selected households,
but that effort has been delayed a few weeks. After the phone survey is
complete, a paper form of the questionnaire will be distributed to all
local households.
This article aims to provide readers with information
on those services and the potential savings if changes are made. Last
week, the News reported on the options listed in the survey that focus
on raising revenue for the Village.
• Gaunt Park Pool
The Gaunt Park Pool is not considered a money-maker and it does
not come close to generating enough income to pay to run the pool. In
2004, the Village budgeted $78,668 for the pool, while the pool brought
in $23,609. That’s a difference of $55,059, which is covered by
the multi-fund. The survey states that the average household cost for
maintaining the pool is $35 a year. This cost comes on top of revenue
the pool generates.
In recent years, the Village has attempted to close
the gap between the pool’s costs and revenue, including raising
rates, reducing hours of operations, focusing on entry requirements and
offering additional services, such as a concession stand, after-hour events
and an additional adult lap swim. “Some gains” have been realized,
Village Manager Rob Hillard said.
Based on recent trends, shutting down the pool would
save the Village approximately $50,000 a year, plus future capital expenses,
which includes a $150,000 project to replace the pool’s leaky gutter.
Council has delayed the gutter project for several years because of its
expense. The pool’s costs include staffing — the streets crew,
which maintains the pool, and nine guards, including the manager and assistant
manager — as well as various operating supplies.
Hillard admitted that the pool “can break even,”
adding that “if we must we must, we can do it.” However, breaking
even would require a “significant reduction” in hours and
staffing and increased fees, he said.
• Yellow Springs police dispatch
The survey asks Yellow Springers whether
they would support eliminating dispatching in the Yellow Springs Police
Department and contracting the service with another larger department,
possibly in Xenia, Beavercreek or Fairborn. The survey says this move
could save the Village $75,000 or more a year.
According to the survey, Yellow Springs is “the
only small community in Greene County to have its own dispatch service.”
Currently, the Village offers dispatching services on a 24/7 basis. The
staff includes three full-timers and seven part-timers.
The Police Department has the largest budget among
the Village’s activities in the general fund, and the second largest
overall, after the electric system. The draft 2005 Village budget projects
that the police force will spend $1.057 million next year, including almost
$919,000 in personnel costs. The department’s employee costs have
risen nearly $180,000 from 2002 to 2005, the draft budget shows.
If dispatching were contracted out, the Village would
continue to maintain its police force and Yellow Springs officers would
still respond to calls from dispatchers outside the Village, Hillard and
Police Chief Carl Bush said. “The most notable difference”
would be that other than officers, the police station would not be staffed
24 hours a day, Bush said.
The department would hire administrative support staff,
or a records clerk, who would likely work in the Bryan Center during normal
business hours, Bush said. The dispatchers fill such administrative duties
now, Hillard said, though the department has a need for more administrative
assistance.
Administrative support staff would answer business
phone calls and in-person requests during the day and provide Yellow Springers
with records requests, Bush and Hillard said. At night and on weekends,
villagers would call a non-emergency number at the contracted department.
Emergency utility calls, which are often taken by the police today, would
be handled by the contracted department, Hillard said.
• Mayor’s Court
The Village expects to receive $35,000
in fines from Mayor’s Court and another $2,000 from Xenia Municipal
Court, which also hears cases from Yellow Springs and sends some fines
back to the Village. The court’s budget for 2005 is $37,299, most
of which pays the salary and benefits for the clerk, June Allison. The
survey reports that the average household cost for Mayor’s Court
is $8 a year. Hillard said that the court’s revenue helps the court
continue to be “financially viable.”
Hillard said that he expects the Yellow Springs Police
Department, which had to hire two new police officers in recent months,
to be able to focus more on enforcement, thus bringing in more revenue
through fines. Though, he added, he does “not send messages to the
police force to write more tickets to make more money.” He just
asks the officers “to do their jobs,” he said.
If Mayor’s Court were eliminated, most court
proceedings would go to Xenia Municipal Court. Because Mayor’s Court
is included in the Village Charter, local residents might have to approve
the elimination of the court, Hillard said.
The existence of Yellow Springs Mayor’s Court
also gives the community control over some court cases, an expense that
is hard to quantify.
• Village Mediation Program
In 2003, Council eliminated a paid position
with the Village Mediation Program, though later Council agreed to add
a small amount of money to the program’s budget to pay for a part-time
coordinator. The Village has budgeted $7,000 for VMP, $5,000 of which
is for the coordinator, Tucker Malishenko.
In 2002, the Village spent $13,333 on a coordinator.
VMP’s budget has declined by $8,771 from 2002 to 2005, the draft
budget shows.
With Malishenko’s help, volunteers have been
running VMP. Last year, members of the VMP Steering Committee said that
the program needed a paid coordinator to support the “intake”
process, when those needing mediation usually make first contact with
the program.
Members of the VMP Steering Committee have said that
the intake process must be handled in a consistent and professional manner
and would not be as effective if it were managed by volunteers. If the
Village completely cuts funding for the program, VMP would likely be eliminated,
Hillard indicated.
Len Kramer, a member of the VMP Steering Committee,
said that he does not think the mediation program can exist in its current
form without funding.
He also said that the Village and Council have been
supportive of the program and noted that VMP now handles about 40 cases
a year, many of which are referred to the program by Village staff. “We
feel we provide a useful service for the Village,” Kramer said.
• Cable access channel 13
As it did for VMP, in 2003 Council eliminated
funding for a paid position for channel 13, the local public access station
run out of the Bryan Center. The channel is completely run by volunteers
and is overseen by the Village Cable Advisory Panel. Next year, the channel
is expected to spend $1,500 in operational expenses, a decrease of $14,309
from 2002, when the Village spent $15,809 on the channel, including $11,789
on a part-time coordinator.
The channel’s operational costs for 2005 do not
include an estimated $30,000 the cable panel wants to spend upgrading
the station’s equipment. Those capital funds were accumulated several
years ago from proceeds gained from the Village’s franchise agreement
with Time Warner. Proceeds from that contract are now placed in the general
fund.
While volunteers can run channel 13, Hillard said that
at some point the Village would have to spend funds on additional equipment
upgrades. The quality of the station’s programming and picture would
suffer if the Village does not reinvest in channel 13, Hillard said.
• Greene County Animal Control
The Village currently contracts with Greene County
Animal Control for what Hillard described as an “extended”
package of services, which include removing dead wildlife from roadways,
providing traps and providing extended hours of enforcement of domestic
animal calls.
The Village would have to handle many of these services
if the Village eliminated its contract with Animal Control. “We
would respond the best we could to complaints,” Hillard said.
In 2005, the Village has budgeted $8,320 for Animal
Control services. These funds come from the multi-fund.
• Bryan Center youth activities
Next year, the Village has budgeted $3,500 for an activity called
Bryan Center youth, $1,500 of which comes from funding from the United
Way. The Bryan youth fund pays for field trips, including one to Kings
Island, and the game room in the Bryan Center. The Village does not charge
to use the Bryan Center gym, Hillard said.
Eliminating the Bryan Center youth fund would force
the Village to close the game room and stop taking field trips, Hillard
said.
In addition, the Village would reduce its costs for
“building monitors” who watch the Bryan Center during business
and weekend hours and clean the building. The Village could realize $20,000
in savings by reducing the use of the monitors, Hillard said.
|